We only get to vote once every four years. We can only choose from two Parties that have both failed us miserably. Then we have to wait. This has resulted in:
Corruption.
Put a few people in charge of the money, and published cases show them using the office for themselves and their friends.
Published conflict-of-interest findings in individual cases. None of these sources states how often this happens.
The rule
A public office holder may not use the office to further their own private interests, a relative’s or a friend’s, or someone else’s improperly.
Conflict of Interest Act, section 9
What the Commissioner found
On 24 July 2024 the Commissioner found Ms. Verschuren contravened the Act by taking part in funding decisions tied to organizations she was involved with. The same report says she did not break the influence rule.
Verschuren Report, published 24 July 2024
Rules written by the people they cover
Members sit in the Parliament that enacts the rules on their pay, pensions, spending, conflict penalties and lobbying. The records below state what those rules say, not why they remain.
The Parliament of Canada Act sets the House of Commons sessional allowance at $141,200 for 2004–05. Each later year it is the previous year’s amount plus that amount times the wage index.
Parliament of Canada Act, section 55.1The Board of Internal Economy is chaired by the Speaker. It also includes two Privy Council members named by the Governor in Council, the Leader of the Opposition or a nominee, and members named by the government caucus and by opposition caucuses of at least 12 members.
Parliament of Canada Act, section 50CBC reported on 14 May 2010 that the Board, including MPs from all four parties, had declined the Auditor General’s request to audit $533 million in annual House and Senate spending. The Board said the audit “would go beyond the scope of the auditor general’s mandate.”
CBC News, 14 May 2010CBC reported on 15 June 2010 that Conservative House leader Jay Hill and Liberal MP Marcel Proulx announced a later Board deal. The Auditor General could audit how parliamentarians control their budgets, but not the individual spending of all MPs.
CBC News, 15 June 2010An Elections Canada review says that, in the elections it covers, the lowest popular vote for a majority was 1997, when the Liberals won 51.5% of the seats with 38.5% of the vote. It says major national parties tend to be the principal beneficiaries when votes are converted into seats.
Elections Canada, Plurality-Majority Electoral Systems: A ReviewThe Lobbying Act bars a designated public office holder from lobbying for five years after leaving office. The Commissioner of Lobbying may exempt a person.
Lobbying Act, section 10.11
These are individual examinations. They do not state how often office holders enrich themselves or their friends.
Sources
- Conflict of Interest Act, section 9
- Conflict of Interest Code for Members, section 8
- Trudeau II Report, published 14 August 2019
- Fergus Report, published 14 February 2023
- Ng Report, published 13 December 2022
- Morneau II Report, published 13 May 2021
- LeBlanc Report, published 12 September 2018
- Verschuren Report, published 24 July 2024
- Ratansi Report, published 15 June 2021
- Idlout Report, published 2 September 2026
- Trudeau III Report, published 13 May 2021
- Parliament of Canada Act, section 55.1
- House of Commons, sessional allowance and additional salaries
- Members of Parliament Retiring Allowances Act, section 13
- Parliament of Canada Act, section 50
- Parliament of Canada Act, section 52.5
- Parliament of Canada Act, section 52.6
- CBC News, 14 May 2010
- CBC News, 15 June 2010
- Conflict of Interest Act, section 52
- Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, annual report 2024–25, Conflict of Interest Act
- Elections Canada, 2011 official results, seats
- Elections Canada, 2011 official results, vote share
- Elections Canada, 2015 official results, seats
- Elections Canada, 2015 official results, vote share
- Elections Canada, Plurality-Majority Electoral Systems: A Review
- Elections Canada, Canada’s Political System
- Liberal Party of Canada, 2015 platform
- Mandate letter, Minister of Democratic Institutions, 1 February 2017
- Lobbying Act, section 10.11
No accountability.
They promise one thing to get elected, do another, and we wait four more years.
Promises on the public record, and what happened after the election. There is no federal recall vote between elections.
Electoral reform
The 2015 Liberal platform said 2015 would be the last federal election under first-past-the-post. It also said the plan would return Canada to a balanced budget in 2019.
Liberal Party of Canada, 2015 platform
Other promises
On 23 April 1996 the Finance Minister quoted the 1993 Liberal promise to replace the GST, and said that day’s plan begins the process and does not complete it.
House of Commons Debates, 23 April 1996On 1 November 2006 the House heard the 2006 Conservative platform line: a Conservative government would preserve income trusts by not imposing any new taxes on them.
House of Commons Debates, 1 November 2006
These are particular promises and later official records. They are not a score for every promise of every government.
Sources
- Liberal Party of Canada, 2015 platform
- Speech from the Throne, 4 December 2015
- House of Commons, Special Committee on Electoral Reform
- Mandate letter, Minister of Democratic Institutions, 1 February 2017
- House of Commons Debates, 1 February 2017
- Elections Canada, Canada’s Political System
- House of Commons Debates, 23 April 1996
- Excise Tax Act, section 165
- House of Commons Debates, 1 November 2006
- Department of Finance, Tax Fairness Plan, 31 October 2006
- An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act, S.C. 2007, c. 10
- Elections Canada, Report on the 40th General Election
- Budget 2019, overview
- Université Laval, POLTEXT, Harper Polimeter methodology
- Canada Elections Act, section 56.1
Ineffective representation.
MPs vote with their party nearly every time. These records do not show whether the riding agreed.
MPs from the same party vote together almost every time, and caucuses have removed members who break ranks. These records do not measure whether a riding disagreed.
When an MP breaks ranks
On 2 April 2019 the Prime Minister removed Jody Wilson-Raybould and Jane Philpott from the Liberal caucus.
CBC News, 2 April 2019
The figures above are agreement with the party. They are not a count of votes cast against a riding’s view.
Division.
Partisan dislike is growing, and more than a third see no room for compromise.
What surveys say about dislike between political sides, and how debate gets framed. Canada is less polarized than the United States, and these sources do not describe a deep split on policy.
Hostility and compromise
A July 2025 Digital Public Square survey, published 12 January 2026, puts the average rating of how polarized Canada feels at 6.5 out of 10. 30% say Canada is highly polarized, and 55% say polarization is getting worse.
Digital Public Square, 12 January 2026In a 12 September 2024 release, 48% say the Conservatives have shifted right and 43% say the Liberals have moved left. 36% call themselves political orphans, including 47% of people who place themselves in the middle, and 48% say no option really represents their views.
Angus Reid Institute, 12 September 2024
Less polarized than the United States
A summer 2024 survey published on 28 October 2025 says Canada’s divisions “are much less intense than in the U.S.” and that Canadians “express moderate levels” of affective polarization. It says this is “not about policy differences,” and that political differences “haven’t yet deeply divided us.”
The Conversation, 28 October 2025A 20 October 2022 Policy Options article says “Canadians generally are not getting more extreme in our views.” It reports Eric Merkley saying Canadians are not growing more polarized along a left-right ideological spectrum.
Policy Options, 20 October 2022In the Digital Public Square survey, 40% identified as right-leaning, 30% as left-leaning and 30% as in the centre. On a 7-point scale, 66% placed themselves in the three centrist positions, 7% on the far right and 5% on the far left.
Digital Public Square, 12 January 2026
Wedge politics
A study of House of Commons debates from 2006 to 2011 finds that a party used one issue to create divisions among opposing MPs and among voters of other parties. It finds that this effort won new support in the 2011 election, especially among cross-pressured voters and in the ridings targeted in those debates.
Dumouchel, Ouellet, and Giasson, Parliamentary Affairs, 2023A 20 October 2022 Policy Options article reports Eric Merkley on a tendency for media pundits and political parties to whittle complex policy debates into binary contests: “left versus right, government versus opposition; the elite versus the people.”
Policy Options, 20 October 2022A study of Question Period from April 2006 to June 2021 finds significant incivility, especially insults and toxicity, and finds that this incivility increases as the next general election approaches. The authors write that one return can be increased support from a party’s own base.
Alvarez and Morrier, Journal of Politics, 2025
These are survey findings and research summaries. The wedge finding is one study of parliamentary debate. They do not measure which public problems were fixed.
Sources
- Angus Reid Institute, 4 February 2022
- Digital Public Square, 12 January 2026
- Eric Merkley, Polarization, Eh?, University of Toronto Press, 2026
- Angus Reid Institute, 12 September 2024
- Samara Centre for Democracy, House Inspection, 42nd Parliament
- The Conversation, 28 October 2025
- Environics Institute, Political Polarization in Canada and the U.S., 17 March 2020
- Policy Options, 20 October 2022
- Christopher Cochrane, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 28 September 2010
- Wilson and Turnbull, Australian Journal of Politics and History, 2001
- Dumouchel, Ouellet, and Giasson, Parliamentary Affairs, 2023
- Alvarez and Morrier, Journal of Politics, 2025
All-or-nothing votes.
We vote for parties, not issues, so we’re forced to take the whole package, even the parts we disagree with.
A ballot picks one candidate, usually with a party name. In the House, recorded votes usually follow that party.
Votes that follow the party
The ballot and the whip are how a party package is chosen and then voted. They are not a list of issues on the ballot.
Sources
- Elections Canada, Canada’s Political System
- House of Commons Procedure and Practice, chapter 1
- Library of Parliament, Omnibus Bills: Frequently Asked Questions, revised 26 January 2022
- Samara Centre for Democracy, House Inspection, 42nd Parliament
- Samara Centre for Democracy, The Reform Act
- Parliament of Canada Act, section 49.1
- Parliament of Canada Act, section 49.2
- Parliament of Canada Act, section 49.8
Out-of-touch decision makers.
An MP’s base allowance is $217,700 beside a median income of $46,300, and some expense claims far exceed an ordinary bill.
The allowance and the median are shown side by side, on different bases. What follows is what reports say was spent, repaid, or disclosed.
The allowance and a median income
$217,700
MP sessional allowance, in effect 1 April 2026
$46,300
Median total income, 2024, excluding people with no income, in 2024 constant dollars
These are not the same kind of figure, so this page does not state a multiple.
What was spent
CBC News reported on 24 April 2012 that International Cooperation Minister Bev Oda’s three-day Savoy bill, after a hotel switch, was $1,995, about $665 a night, including orange juice at $16. She repaid $1,353.81.
CBC News, 24 April 2012The Toronto Sun reported on 10 April 2026 that order-paper answers showed $524,815.04 billed for in-flight catering on 28 prime ministerial trips from March 2025 to February 2026. The largest, to the United Arab Emirates and the G20 in Johannesburg, was $158,986.43.
Toronto Sun, 10 April 2026The National Post reported on 18 June 2024 that an order-paper answer put in-flight catering for Justin Trudeau’s September 2023 Indo-Pacific trip at $223,234. It also reported a $100,000 in-flight catering bill for Governor General Mary Simon and 29 guests on a March 2022 trip to Dubai.
National Post, 18 June 2024In a June 2015 report, the Auditor General found that 30 senators or former senators had expenses outside Senate rules, not for parliamentary business, or too poorly documented for an audit opinion. The audit covered more than 80,000 items totalling $45 million, from 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2013, and did not assess intent.
Auditor General of Canada, report to the Senate, June 2015The Trudeau Report of 20 December 2017 found that Justin Trudeau contravened sections 5, 11, 12 and 21 of the Conflict of Interest Act over vacations on Bells Cay, a private island in the Bahamas owned by the Aga Khan, including 26 December 2016 to 4 January 2017. He did not contravene subsection 14(1) of the Members’ Code, or subsection 6(1) or section 7 of the Act.
Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, The Trudeau Report, 20 December 2017
What was disclosed
Global News reported on 28 June 2026, using Ethics Commissioner summaries, that 38 per cent of ministers are landlords and that 103 MPs or their spouses disclosed rental income, a rental property, or a related business, including Conservatives, Liberals, Bloc Québécois MPs, and an independent. As of 23 June 2026, 11 of 343 disclosures were still unpublished, so this is not a share of the whole House.
Global News, 28 June 2026
The allowance is a 2026 salary and the median is 2024 total income, so they are not a multiple of each other. The other figures are what the cited reports say was spent, repaid, or disclosed.
Sources
- House of Commons, sessional allowance and additional salaries
- Statistics Canada, Table 11-10-0239-01, released 29 April 2026
- CBC News, 24 April 2012
- Toronto Sun, 10 April 2026
- National Post, 18 June 2024
- Auditor General of Canada, report to the Senate, June 2015
- Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, The Trudeau Report, 20 December 2017
- Global News, 28 June 2026
Lobbyists have the loudest voice.
Whoever can afford the best access gets heard. The rest of us get one checkmark every four years.
Who is registered to lobby, and how that compares with the election calendar. The counts do not rank whose voice is loudest.
Registered lobbying
The Lobbying Act calls lobbying legitimate, and says the public should be able to know who is paid to do it.
Lobbying Act, preambleIn 2024–25 there were 1,670 consultant lobbyists, 7,214 in-house lobbyists, and 31,058 oral, arranged communications. MPs were named in 11,417 reports, more than any other office in that table, ahead of ministers at 1,774 and the Prime Minister at 78.
Commissioner of Lobbying, Annual Report 2024–25Designated office holders include ministers and deputy ministers. That section does not list MPs.
Lobbying Act, section 2A corporation or organization must file when employees lobby public office holders as part of the job.
Lobbying Act, section 7
These are registration counts and a calendar rule. They do not rank whose voice is loudest.
Short-term thinking.
Federal debt was $1,266.5 billion on 31 March 2025, and interest that year was $53.4 billion.
The accumulated deficit at four year-ends, then the interest on that debt. The per-person amount is a labelled division, not a published statistic.
The federal debt
$1,266.5 billion
Federal debt on 31 March 2025
$30,482
Per person, from the division below
The per-person amount is $1,266,484 million divided by the 1 April 2025 population estimate, rounded to the nearest dollar. That estimate is preliminary. It is not a published debt-per-person statistic.
In the Fiscal Reference Tables, the accumulated deficit was $481,499 million in 2005–06, $628,910 million in 2014–15, $685,450 million in 2018–19, and $1,266,484 million in 2024–25. As a share of GDP those totals were 33.9%, 31.5%, 30.7%, and 41.2%.
Department of Finance, Fiscal Reference Tables 2025, part 1Dividing the 2024–25 accumulated deficit of $1,266,484 million by that estimate gives $30,482 per person, rounded to the nearest dollar.
Interest
Budget 2025 projects public debt charges of $55.6 billion in 2025–26, rising to $76.1 billion in 2029–30.
Budget 2025, Annex 1
Who pays later
The C.D. Howe Institute writes that deficit financing raises intergenerational fairness issues, because the people who benefit from the spending do not pay its full cost. It also says a public update of the finances before an election can attenuate deficit bias.
C.D. Howe Institute, 23 March 2023
The dollar debt is higher at each of these year-ends. As a share of the economy it was lower in 2018–19 than in 2005–06, then higher by 2024–25. The two interest projections are from different dates and do not match.
Sources
- Department of Finance, Fiscal Reference Tables 2025, part 1
- Annual Financial Report of the Government of Canada, 2024–2025
- Statistics Canada, population estimates, released 18 June 2025
- Department of Finance, 2024–25 results, Canada Health Transfer
- Budget 2025, Annex 1
- Parliamentary Budget Officer, 4 June 2025
- C.D. Howe Institute, 23 March 2023
- Fraser Institute, Grady Munro and Jake Fuss, 2024
- Parliamentary Budget Officer, Fiscal Sustainability Report 2024