Skip to content

The Problem

We only get to vote once every four years. We can only choose from two Parties that have both failed us miserably. Then we have to wait. This has resulted in:

Corruption.

Put a few people in charge of the money, and published cases show them using the office for themselves and their friends.

Published conflict-of-interest findings in individual cases. None of these sources states how often this happens.

The rule

What the Commissioner found

Rules written by the people they cover

These are individual examinations. They do not state how often office holders enrich themselves or their friends.

Sources

  1. Conflict of Interest Act, section 9
  2. Conflict of Interest Code for Members, section 8
  3. Trudeau II Report, published 14 August 2019
  4. Fergus Report, published 14 February 2023
  5. Ng Report, published 13 December 2022
  6. Morneau II Report, published 13 May 2021
  7. LeBlanc Report, published 12 September 2018
  8. Verschuren Report, published 24 July 2024
  9. Ratansi Report, published 15 June 2021
  10. Idlout Report, published 2 September 2026
  11. Trudeau III Report, published 13 May 2021
  12. Parliament of Canada Act, section 55.1
  13. House of Commons, sessional allowance and additional salaries
  14. Members of Parliament Retiring Allowances Act, section 13
  15. Parliament of Canada Act, section 50
  16. Parliament of Canada Act, section 52.5
  17. Parliament of Canada Act, section 52.6
  18. CBC News, 14 May 2010
  19. CBC News, 15 June 2010
  20. Conflict of Interest Act, section 52
  21. Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, annual report 2024–25, Conflict of Interest Act
  22. Elections Canada, 2011 official results, seats
  23. Elections Canada, 2011 official results, vote share
  24. Elections Canada, 2015 official results, seats
  25. Elections Canada, 2015 official results, vote share
  26. Elections Canada, Plurality-Majority Electoral Systems: A Review
  27. Elections Canada, Canada’s Political System
  28. Liberal Party of Canada, 2015 platform
  29. Mandate letter, Minister of Democratic Institutions, 1 February 2017
  30. Lobbying Act, section 10.11

No accountability.

They promise one thing to get elected, do another, and we wait four more years.

Promises on the public record, and what happened after the election. There is no federal recall vote between elections.

Electoral reform

Other promises

Between elections

These are particular promises and later official records. They are not a score for every promise of every government.

Sources

  1. Liberal Party of Canada, 2015 platform
  2. Speech from the Throne, 4 December 2015
  3. House of Commons, Special Committee on Electoral Reform
  4. Mandate letter, Minister of Democratic Institutions, 1 February 2017
  5. House of Commons Debates, 1 February 2017
  6. Elections Canada, Canada’s Political System
  7. House of Commons Debates, 23 April 1996
  8. Excise Tax Act, section 165
  9. House of Commons Debates, 1 November 2006
  10. Department of Finance, Tax Fairness Plan, 31 October 2006
  11. An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act, S.C. 2007, c. 10
  12. Elections Canada, Report on the 40th General Election
  13. Budget 2019, overview
  14. Université Laval, POLTEXT, Harper Polimeter methodology
  15. Canada Elections Act, section 56.1

Ineffective representation.

MPs vote with their party nearly every time. These records do not show whether the riding agreed.

MPs from the same party vote together almost every time, and caucuses have removed members who break ranks. These records do not measure whether a riding disagreed.

How often

When an MP breaks ranks

The figures above are agreement with the party. They are not a count of votes cast against a riding’s view.

Sources

  1. Samara Centre for Democracy, House Inspection, 42nd Parliament
  2. Samara Centre for Democracy, The Reform Act
  3. House of Commons Procedure and Practice, chapter 1
  4. Parliament of Canada Act, section 49.1
  5. Parliament of Canada Act, section 49.2
  6. Parliament of Canada Act, section 49.8
  7. CBC News, 2 April 2019
  8. CBC News, 20 January 2021

Division.

Partisan dislike is growing, and more than a third see no room for compromise.

What surveys say about dislike between political sides, and how debate gets framed. Canada is less polarized than the United States, and these sources do not describe a deep split on policy.

Hostility and compromise

  • On 4 February 2022, Angus Reid reported that 37% of Canadians feel there is no room for political compromise. 48% disagree.

    Angus Reid Institute, 4 February 2022
  • A July 2025 Digital Public Square survey, published 12 January 2026, puts the average rating of how polarized Canada feels at 6.5 out of 10. 30% say Canada is highly polarized, and 55% say polarization is getting worse.

    Digital Public Square, 12 January 2026
  • Eric Merkley’s 2026 book examines “the growing affective polarization and inter-partisan hostility in Canada,” including Conservative supporters “antagonistic towards Liberal and NDP voters and vice versa.”

    Eric Merkley, Polarization, Eh?, University of Toronto Press, 2026
  • In a 12 September 2024 release, 48% say the Conservatives have shifted right and 43% say the Liberals have moved left. 36% call themselves political orphans, including 47% of people who place themselves in the middle, and 48% say no option really represents their views.

    Angus Reid Institute, 12 September 2024
  • MPs said cross-party collaboration declined in the 42nd Parliament, and that House debate was empty and repetitive. Heckling did not decrease.

    Samara Centre for Democracy, House Inspection, 42nd Parliament

Less polarized than the United States

Wedge politics

  • Scholars define wedge politics as “a calculated political tactic aimed at using divisive social issues to gain political support, weaken opponents and strengthen control over the political agenda.” They write that the tactic aims at undermining an opponent’s support base.

    Wilson and Turnbull, Australian Journal of Politics and History, 2001
  • A study of House of Commons debates from 2006 to 2011 finds that a party used one issue to create divisions among opposing MPs and among voters of other parties. It finds that this effort won new support in the 2011 election, especially among cross-pressured voters and in the ridings targeted in those debates.

    Dumouchel, Ouellet, and Giasson, Parliamentary Affairs, 2023
  • A 20 October 2022 Policy Options article reports Eric Merkley on a tendency for media pundits and political parties to whittle complex policy debates into binary contests: “left versus right, government versus opposition; the elite versus the people.”

    Policy Options, 20 October 2022
  • A study of Question Period from April 2006 to June 2021 finds significant incivility, especially insults and toxicity, and finds that this incivility increases as the next general election approaches. The authors write that one return can be increased support from a party’s own base.

    Alvarez and Morrier, Journal of Politics, 2025

These are survey findings and research summaries. The wedge finding is one study of parliamentary debate. They do not measure which public problems were fixed.

Sources

  1. Angus Reid Institute, 4 February 2022
  2. Digital Public Square, 12 January 2026
  3. Eric Merkley, Polarization, Eh?, University of Toronto Press, 2026
  4. Angus Reid Institute, 12 September 2024
  5. Samara Centre for Democracy, House Inspection, 42nd Parliament
  6. The Conversation, 28 October 2025
  7. Environics Institute, Political Polarization in Canada and the U.S., 17 March 2020
  8. Policy Options, 20 October 2022
  9. Christopher Cochrane, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 28 September 2010
  10. Wilson and Turnbull, Australian Journal of Politics and History, 2001
  11. Dumouchel, Ouellet, and Giasson, Parliamentary Affairs, 2023
  12. Alvarez and Morrier, Journal of Politics, 2025

All-or-nothing votes.

We vote for parties, not issues, so we’re forced to take the whole package, even the parts we disagree with.

A ballot picks one candidate, usually with a party name. In the House, recorded votes usually follow that party.

One vote, one candidate

Votes that follow the party

The ballot and the whip are how a party package is chosen and then voted. They are not a list of issues on the ballot.

Sources

  1. Elections Canada, Canada’s Political System
  2. House of Commons Procedure and Practice, chapter 1
  3. Library of Parliament, Omnibus Bills: Frequently Asked Questions, revised 26 January 2022
  4. Samara Centre for Democracy, House Inspection, 42nd Parliament
  5. Samara Centre for Democracy, The Reform Act
  6. Parliament of Canada Act, section 49.1
  7. Parliament of Canada Act, section 49.2
  8. Parliament of Canada Act, section 49.8

Out-of-touch decision makers.

An MP’s base allowance is $217,700 beside a median income of $46,300, and some expense claims far exceed an ordinary bill.

The allowance and the median are shown side by side, on different bases. What follows is what reports say was spent, repaid, or disclosed.

The allowance and a median income

$217,700

MP sessional allowance, in effect 1 April 2026

$46,300

Median total income, 2024, excluding people with no income, in 2024 constant dollars

These are not the same kind of figure, so this page does not state a multiple.

What was spent

  • CBC News reported on 24 April 2012 that International Cooperation Minister Bev Oda’s three-day Savoy bill, after a hotel switch, was $1,995, about $665 a night, including orange juice at $16. She repaid $1,353.81.

    CBC News, 24 April 2012
  • The Toronto Sun reported on 10 April 2026 that order-paper answers showed $524,815.04 billed for in-flight catering on 28 prime ministerial trips from March 2025 to February 2026. The largest, to the United Arab Emirates and the G20 in Johannesburg, was $158,986.43.

    Toronto Sun, 10 April 2026
  • The National Post reported on 18 June 2024 that an order-paper answer put in-flight catering for Justin Trudeau’s September 2023 Indo-Pacific trip at $223,234. It also reported a $100,000 in-flight catering bill for Governor General Mary Simon and 29 guests on a March 2022 trip to Dubai.

    National Post, 18 June 2024
  • In a June 2015 report, the Auditor General found that 30 senators or former senators had expenses outside Senate rules, not for parliamentary business, or too poorly documented for an audit opinion. The audit covered more than 80,000 items totalling $45 million, from 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2013, and did not assess intent.

    Auditor General of Canada, report to the Senate, June 2015
  • The Trudeau Report of 20 December 2017 found that Justin Trudeau contravened sections 5, 11, 12 and 21 of the Conflict of Interest Act over vacations on Bells Cay, a private island in the Bahamas owned by the Aga Khan, including 26 December 2016 to 4 January 2017. He did not contravene subsection 14(1) of the Members’ Code, or subsection 6(1) or section 7 of the Act.

    Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, The Trudeau Report, 20 December 2017

What was disclosed

  • Global News reported on 28 June 2026, using Ethics Commissioner summaries, that 38 per cent of ministers are landlords and that 103 MPs or their spouses disclosed rental income, a rental property, or a related business, including Conservatives, Liberals, Bloc Québécois MPs, and an independent. As of 23 June 2026, 11 of 343 disclosures were still unpublished, so this is not a share of the whole House.

    Global News, 28 June 2026

The allowance is a 2026 salary and the median is 2024 total income, so they are not a multiple of each other. The other figures are what the cited reports say was spent, repaid, or disclosed.

Sources

  1. House of Commons, sessional allowance and additional salaries
  2. Statistics Canada, Table 11-10-0239-01, released 29 April 2026
  3. CBC News, 24 April 2012
  4. Toronto Sun, 10 April 2026
  5. National Post, 18 June 2024
  6. Auditor General of Canada, report to the Senate, June 2015
  7. Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, The Trudeau Report, 20 December 2017
  8. Global News, 28 June 2026

Lobbyists have the loudest voice.

Whoever can afford the best access gets heard. The rest of us get one checkmark every four years.

Who is registered to lobby, and how that compares with the election calendar. The counts do not rank whose voice is loudest.

Registered lobbying

  • The Lobbying Act calls lobbying legitimate, and says the public should be able to know who is paid to do it.

    Lobbying Act, preamble
  • In 2024–25 there were 1,670 consultant lobbyists, 7,214 in-house lobbyists, and 31,058 oral, arranged communications. MPs were named in 11,417 reports, more than any other office in that table, ahead of ministers at 1,774 and the Prime Minister at 78.

    Commissioner of Lobbying, Annual Report 2024–25
  • Designated office holders include ministers and deputy ministers. That section does not list MPs.

    Lobbying Act, section 2
  • A paid consultant must file a return within 10 days of agreeing to lobby.

    Lobbying Act, section 5
  • A corporation or organization must file when employees lobby public office holders as part of the job.

    Lobbying Act, section 7
  • The Commissioner must develop a code of conduct for lobbyists.

    Lobbying Act, section 10.2

The election calendar

These are registration counts and a calendar rule. They do not rank whose voice is loudest.

Sources

  1. Lobbying Act, preamble
  2. Commissioner of Lobbying, Annual Report 2024–25
  3. Lobbying Act, section 2
  4. Lobbying Act, section 5
  5. Lobbying Act, section 7
  6. Lobbying Act, section 10.2
  7. Canada Elections Act, section 56.1
  8. Elections Canada, The Electoral Cycle

Short-term thinking.

Federal debt was $1,266.5 billion on 31 March 2025, and interest that year was $53.4 billion.

The accumulated deficit at four year-ends, then the interest on that debt. The per-person amount is a labelled division, not a published statistic.

The federal debt

$1,266.5 billion

Federal debt on 31 March 2025

$30,482

Per person, from the division below

The per-person amount is $1,266,484 million divided by the 1 April 2025 population estimate, rounded to the nearest dollar. That estimate is preliminary. It is not a published debt-per-person statistic.

Interest

Who pays later

  • The C.D. Howe Institute writes that deficit financing raises intergenerational fairness issues, because the people who benefit from the spending do not pay its full cost. It also says a public update of the finances before an election can attenuate deficit bias.

    C.D. Howe Institute, 23 March 2023
  • A 2024 Fraser Institute study says accumulating debt today increases the tax burden on future generations, because they will be responsible for paying it off.

    Fraser Institute, Grady Munro and Jake Fuss, 2024
  • The Parliamentary Budget Officer’s 2024 report still finds current federal fiscal policy sustainable over the long term, with room of 1.5% of GDP ($46 billion in current dollars) to raise spending or cut taxes and stabilize net debt at 29.1% of GDP.

    Parliamentary Budget Officer, Fiscal Sustainability Report 2024

The dollar debt is higher at each of these year-ends. As a share of the economy it was lower in 2018–19 than in 2005–06, then higher by 2024–25. The two interest projections are from different dates and do not match.

Sources

  1. Department of Finance, Fiscal Reference Tables 2025, part 1
  2. Annual Financial Report of the Government of Canada, 2024–2025
  3. Statistics Canada, population estimates, released 18 June 2025
  4. Department of Finance, 2024–25 results, Canada Health Transfer
  5. Budget 2025, Annex 1
  6. Parliamentary Budget Officer, 4 June 2025
  7. C.D. Howe Institute, 23 March 2023
  8. Fraser Institute, Grady Munro and Jake Fuss, 2024
  9. Parliamentary Budget Officer, Fiscal Sustainability Report 2024